Tisdale v. City of Mentor Ohio et al
| Venis Tisdale |
| Mentor Municipal Court and City of Mentor Ohio |
| 1:2019cv02530 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Amended complaint against City of Mentor Ohio, Mentor Municipal Court. Filed by Venis Tisdale. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (B,R) |
| Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Venis Tisdale. (B,R) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to #1 Complaint, Two CD's containing medical records of Venis Tisdale on file in the Clerk's Office filed by Venis Tisdale. Related document(s) #1 . (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Money Damages against City of Mentor Ohio, and Mentor Municipal Court. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Venis Tisdale. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Code of Ethics, #2 Copy of Indictment from Lake Couty with documents from Mentor Municipal Court, #3 Articles regarding Ptl. Mathew Mazany, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
