Guttu v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert E Guttu |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv02593 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jonathan D Greenberg |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal personally executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the Office of the US Attorney, Northern District of Ohio on 11/13/2019; by FedEx on U.S. Attorney General on 11/15/2019; and by FedEx on the Office of Regional Chief Counsel of Social Security Administration on 11/15/2019, filed on behalf of Robert E Guttu (L,MI) |
| Filing 7 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 11/8/2019 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security. (S,S) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S) |
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/8/2019. (S,S)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #3 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 11/8/2019. (S,S)
|
| Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI) |
| Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Robert E Guttu. (Balin, Paulette) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Notice filed by Robert E Guttu. (Balin, Paulette) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Robert E Guttu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Social Security Administration, #3 Summons Department of Justice, #4 Summons Office of United States Attorney, #5 USM-285 Social Security Administration, #6 USM-285 Department of Justice, #7 USM-285 Office of United States Attorney) (Balin, Paulette) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/6/2019. (L,MI) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guttu v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert E Guttu | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Shupe |
| Represented By: | Paulette F. Balin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
