Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
James R Marshall and James R. Marshall |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2019cv02637 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Jonathan D Greenberg |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
IMPORTANT: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. Information regarding NextGen can be found # on the court's website.Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a multi-step process. Step one is to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Currently, attorneys within a firm may share a PACER account. This will not be allowed with NextGen. Each attorney must have their own upgraded PACER account. If you are using a shared PACER account, register for a new PACER account by clicking # here.If you have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014, no further action is required at this time. If neither applies, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account. If this is not done, you will be unable to e-file after February 10, 2020. Instructions for linking your PACER account to your CM/ECF account will be sent in February. If you still have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6854 or the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o US Attorney's Office on 12/5/2019; and by FedEx upon William Barr, US Attorney General on 12/6/2019; and by FedEx upon the Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region V, Social Security Administration on 12/6/2019 filed on behalf of James R. Marshall (Related document(s) #7 ) (J,FE) |
Filing 7 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 12/3/2019 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security. (S,S) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 12/3/2019. (S,S) |
Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 12/3/2019. (S,S) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI) |
Filing 3 Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by James R Marshall. (Shifrin, Debra) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff James R Marshall. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by James R Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Shifrin, Debra). |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/12/2019. (L,MI) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.