Watson v. Aetna Insurance Company, et al.
| Kenneth R. Watson |
| United Auto Workers Retiree Benefit Trust and Aetna Insurance Company |
| 1:2019cv02675 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1381 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order approving #4 Plaintiff's Request to dismiss case. Case dismissed per Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/4/2019. (D, I)
|
| Filing 4 Request to dismiss case filed by Plaintiff Kenneth R. Watson. (W,CM) |
|
Filing 3
Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/15/2019. (D, I)
|
| Copy of #3 Order mailed to Kenneth R. Watson at 4011 Riverside Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44109 and emailed to email address provided to chambers on 11/15/2019. (D, I) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kenneth R. Watson. (Attachments: #1 Social Security deposit information)(Y,A) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Aetna Insurance Company, United Auto Workers Retiree Benefit Trust. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Kenneth R. Watson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Y,A) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (Y,A) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
