Szep v. General Motors LLC
| Thomas Szep |
| General Motors LLC |
| 1:2019cv02858 |
| December 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/7/2020 granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney April N. Ross for General Motors LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #6 )(S,KM)
|
| Filing 6 Motion for attorney April N. Ross to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120.00, receipt number 0647-9769715, filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1Affidavit of April N. Ross in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Dickerson, Denise) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Denise A. Dickerson filed by on behalf of General Motors LLC. (Dickerson, Denise) |
| LAST NOTICE: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. In order to complete our final transition to NextGen, CM/ECF will be offline starting at 12:00 noon on Friday, February 7, 2020, through 11:59 p.m. Sunday, February 9, 2020. Pursuant to General Order 2020-02, we have established an email box, nextgenfilings@ohnd.uscourts.gov, for submitting documents to be filed during this period.Preparing for NextGen is a two-step process. Step one was to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Each attorney should have their own individual upgraded PACER account at this time. Step two will be to link your upgraded PACER account to your OHND e-filing account in the NextGen CM/ECF system on or after February 10, 2020. # Linking Instructions. You will be unable to e-file until the accounts are linked. If you have any additional questions, please call the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
| IMPORTANT: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. Information regarding NextGen can be found # on the court's website.Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a multi-step process. Step one is to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Currently, attorneys within a firm may share a PACER account. This will not be allowed with NextGen. Each attorney must have their own upgraded PACER account. If you are using a shared PACER account, register for a new PACER account by clicking # here.If you have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014, no further action is required at this time. If neither applies, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account. If this is not done, you will be unable to e-file after February 10, 2020. Instructions for linking your PACER account to your CM/ECF account will be sent in February. If you still have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6854 or the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
| Filing 4 Class Action Complaint filed by Thomas Szep. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hawal, Justin) Modified tedxt on 12/13/2019 (S,SR). |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon General Motors LLC c/o CSC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Thomas Szep. Related document(s) #1 . (DiCello, Mark) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against General Motors LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9669501. Filed by Thomas Szep. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (DiCello, Mark) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (B,R) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Szep v. General Motors LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Szep | |
| Represented By: | Justin J. Hawal |
| Represented By: | Mark A. DiCello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: General Motors LLC | |
| Represented By: | April N. Ross |
| Represented By: | Denise A. Dickerson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
