City of Cullman, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
City of Cullman, Alabama |
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc f/k/a Actavis Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis LLC, Cephalon Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Cardinal Health Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt PLC, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLS, Noramco Inc, Endo Health Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Purdue Pharma Inc. |
1:2019op45248 |
April 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Alabama Northern. Case number 5:19-cv-00444. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3 ORDER Transferring Case to MDL: ORDER of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the District of Northern Ohio for inclusion in MDL #2804; record electronically transferred to Clerk of Northern Ohio. (BJL) [Transferred from alnd on 4/16/2019.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) [Transferred from alnd on 4/16/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma Inc, Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLS, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Pharmaceuticals Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Pharma LP, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc, and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc f/k/a Actavis Inc filed by City of Cullman, Alabama.(BJL) [Transferred from alnd on 4/16/2019.] |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3301124 (receipt number B4601096116). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma Inc, Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLS, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Pharmaceuticals Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Pharma LP, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc, and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc f/k/a Actavis Inc filed by City of Cullman, Alabama.(BJL). (Mougey, Peter) Modified on 3/15/2019 (BJL). [Transferred from alnd on 4/16/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.