City of South Sioux City, Nebraska v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
City of South Sioux City Nebraska |
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC, The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Watson Laboratories Inc., Allergan PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis LLC, Cephalon Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Cardinal Health Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Noramco Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Purdue Pharma Inc. |
1:2019op45553 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by City of South Sioux City Nebraska. Actavis LLC waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Actavis Pharma, Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Cardinal Health Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Cephalon Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Endo Health Solutions Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Johnson & Johnson waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Mallinckrodt LLC waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; McKesson Corporation waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Noramco Inc waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Purdue Pharma Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Purdue Pharma L.P. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Watson Laboratories Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. waiver sent on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019 filed on behalf of City of South Sioux City Nebraska (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Signed Waivers)(Peterson, James) |
Filing 11 Attorney Appearance by Paul T. Farrell, Jr filed by on behalf of City of South Sioux City Nebraska. (Farrell, Paul) |
Filing 10 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Nebraska. Case number 8:19-cv-00244. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case is transferred to USDC-Northern District of Ohio, Docket No. 2804. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 8 COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Clerk to wait for certified copy of order to transfer the file to USDC-Northern District of Ohio, Docket No. 2804. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Case transferred to USDC-Northern District of Ohio. Original electronic file sent. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 7 ORDER REINSTATING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANFER ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as "CTO-96" filed on June 12, 2019, is REINSTATED. MDL No. 2804. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 6 COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Clerk to wait for certified copy of order to transfer the file to USDC-Northern District of Ohio, Docket No. 2804. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk regarding Complaint #1 with certified copy of docket sheet to Multidistrict Litigation Clerks Office. (LKO) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that due to clerical error, this case is reassigned to Senior District Judge Laurie Smith Camp for disposition and remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (TCL) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney James C. Peterson has not registered for admittance to practice. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3952906), by Attorney Gregory R. Abboud on behalf of City of South Sioux City Nebraska, a municipal corporation (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Abboud, Gregory) [Transferred from ned on 6/24/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.