Wells County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
| Wells County |
| Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt PLC, Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company, Watson Laboratories Inc., Allergan PLC, Cardinal Health Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis LLC, AbbVie Inc., CVS Health, Ortho-Mcneil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., The Kroger Company, Cephalon Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Does 1-100, Covidien PLC, Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SpecGX LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Purdue Pharma Inc. |
| 1:2019op45682 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of North Dakota. Case number 1:19-cv-00136. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-104) (certified copy) transferring case to Northern District of Ohio to be included in MDL Docket No. 2804. Case transferred via ECF extract civil case feature.(am) [Transferred from ndd on 8/1/2019.] |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Abbvie Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Allergan PLC, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, CVS Health, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Covidien PLC, Does 1-100, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Mallinckrodt PLC, Mallinckrodt, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Qualitest Pharmaceutical Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, SpecGx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Kroger Company, The Purdue Frederick Company, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.. (cjs) [Transferred from ndd on 8/1/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Abbvie Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Allergan PLC, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, CVS Health, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Covidien PLC, Does 1-100, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Mallinckrodt PLC, Mallinckrodt, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Qualitest Pharmaceutical Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, SpecGx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Kroger Company, The Purdue Frederick Company, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 119001171) filed by Wells County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjs) [Transferred from ndd on 8/1/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
