Suffolk Transportation Services, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation et al
Suffolk Transportation Services, Inc. |
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Wal-Mart Inc., Mallinckrodt plc d/b/a Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. n/k/a Actavis, Inc., TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis LLC, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.,, Cardinal Health, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., DOES 1 - 100, Inclusive, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis, PLC, Johnson & Johnson, Allergan Finance, LLC, Teva Phamaceutical Industries Ltd, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Janseen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rite-Aid of Maryland, Inc. |
1:2019op45933 |
October 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9588094.. Filed by Suffolk Transportation Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tate, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.