The City of Dunwoody, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Coropration et al
| The City of Dunwoody, Georgia |
| Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.;, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. nka Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, f/k/a ACTAVIS PLC, NORAMCO, INC.,, Johnson & Johnson, Cephalon, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Drug Coropration, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC n/k/a ACTAVIS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.;, MALLINCKRODT PLC,, TEVA PHARMACEUTCIALS USA, INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. N/K/A/ JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC.,, Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD and ACTAVIS LLC, |
| 1:2019op46054 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9641182. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action. Filed by The City of Dunwoody, Georgia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Friedman, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
