Melville Fire District, New York v. McKesson Corporation et al
Melville Fire District, New York |
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Wal-Mart Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Mallinckrodt plc d/b/a Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. n/k/a Actavis, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLC, Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., DOES 1 - 100, Inclusive, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Allergan Finance, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Noramco, Inc. and Rite-Aid of Maryland, Inc. |
1:2019op46112 |
December 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9661516. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:17-md-2804. Filed by Melville Fire District, New York. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tate, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.