Moe v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd et al
Alexander Moe |
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Actavis Inc, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cephalon Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Watson Laboratories Inc. and Actavis plc |
1:2019op46138 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Virginia Eastern. Case number 1:19-cv-01469. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 2 Certified Transfer Order (CTO-124) from the MDL. MDL No 2804. (aott) [Transferred from vaed on 12/16/2019.] |
Case Electronically transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. (aott) [Transferred from vaed on 12/16/2019.] |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (lcre, ) [Transferred from vaed on 12/16/2019.] |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6946971.), filed by Alexander Moe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Connolly, John) [Transferred from vaed on 12/16/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.