Marsh v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Ranier Marsh
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv00157
Filed: January 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2020 Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon the U.S. Attorney on 1/28/2020; by FedEx upon the Attorney General on 1/30/2020 and upon the Office of Regional Chief Counsel - Social Security Administration on 1/30/2020 filed on behalf of Ranier Marsh Related document(s) #5 . (J,FE)
January 24, 2020 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/24/2020. (G,CA)
January 24, 2020 Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of the Social Security Administration c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,CA)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/24/2020.(G,CA)
January 23, 2020 Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 1/23/2020. (L,MI) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/23/2020: #1 Exhibit A - Witness List, #2 Exhibit B - Exhibit List) (L,MI).
January 23, 2020 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
January 23, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ranier Marsh. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia)
January 23, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ranier Marsh. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia)
January 23, 2020 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Sara Lioi on 1/23/2020. (L,MI)
January 23, 2020 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (L,MI)
January 23, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marsh v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ranier Marsh
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?