Reid v. JDAC Of Euclid, Inc., et al
| Tamara T. Reid |
| Trans Union, LLC and JDAC of Euclid, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00192 |
| January 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by Scott E. Brady filed by on behalf of Trans Union, LLC. (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Common Pleas Court Of Cuyahoga County, Ohio Civil Division, case number CV-20 927271 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9750121.. Filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Exhibit B-Complaint to Trans Union, LLC, #4 Exhibit C-Defendant JDAC Of Euclid, Inc., d/b/a CNAC Consent For Removal) (Brady, Scott) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case,. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
