Mele v. Arthur Louis Steel Company
| Dominic Mele |
| Arthur Louis Steel Company |
| 1:2020cv00585 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Initial Disclosures filed by All Defendants. (Zorc, Katie) |
| Filing 8 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Pursuant to Civil Rule 26(f) - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Defendants. (Zorc, Katie) |
| Filing 7 Proof of Service by by process server executed upon Arthur Louis Steel Company on 3/27/2020, filed on behalf of Dominic Mele Related document(s) #1 . (Thompson, Nicholas) |
Filing 6
Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/9/2020 setting a case management conference on 6/3/2020 at 09:00 AM in Chambers 18A before Judge James S. Gwin. IMPORTANT: The parties are advised to carefully read this Order. The Court requires the attendance of (1) all parties, (2) lead counsel and (3) a representative with full authority for settlement purposes. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1. Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Appendix 2. Local Rule 30.1)(S,KM)
|
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey A. Ford and David E. Pontius filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Ford, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Arthur Louis Steel Company. (Zorc, Katie) |
| Filing 3 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Arthur Louis Steel Company. (Zorc, Katie) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Arthur Louis Steel Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against The Arthur Louis Steel Company. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-9868144.. Filed by Dominic Mele. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mele v. Arthur Louis Steel Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dominic Mele | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arthur Louis Steel Company | |
| Represented By: | David E. Pontius |
| Represented By: | Katie L. Zorc |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Ford |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Dorman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
