Doe v. Oberlin College, et al.
| John Doe |
| Oberlin College, Rebecca Mosely, Oberlin College Doe and Oberlin College Board of Trustees |
| 1:2020cv00669 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Magistrate Consent Form issued. (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Oberlin College. (Wallace, David)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal from Court of Common Pleas, Lorain County, Ohio, case number 20CV200913 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $400, receipt number AOHNDC-9889607. Filed by Oberlin College Doe Defendants 1-10, Oberlin College, Rebecca Mosely, Oberlin College Board of Trustees. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Verified Complaint (with Notice of Filing of Exhibits), #2 Exhibit 2 - Ex Parte Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction, #3 Exhibit 3 - Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction, #4 Exhibit 4 - Judge Cook's Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wallace, David)
|
|
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (Y,A)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
