Rolfes v. Davis et al
| Jeremy Rolfes |
| Ohio Department of Rehabilation and Corrections and Mike Davis |
| 1:2020cv00686 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Rolfes. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Account Statement)(B,R)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Mike Davis, Ohio Department of Rehabilation and Corrections. Filing fee not paid, IFP... Filed by Jeremy Rolfes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A - Religious Service Form, #3 Exhibit B - Request for Religious Accommodation, #4 Exhibit C - Request Response, #5 Exhibit D - Decision, #6 Exhibit E - Appeal of Decision, #7 Exhibit F - Letter accompanying appeal, #8 Exhibit G - Letter to Mr. Davis, #9 Exhibit H - Kite 08/23, #10 Exhibit I - Informal Complaint, #11 Exhibit J - Kite 10/08, #12 Exhibit K - Kite 12/10, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Summons, #15 USM-285) (B,R)
|
|
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (B,R)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (B,R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
