Ridolfi v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Richard Ridolfi
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv01111
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Referring Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2020 Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by Federal Express executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration, c/o U.S. Attorney General on 7/8/2020; by Federal Express on Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 6/11/2020 (unsigned marked C19), filed on behalf of Richard Ridolfi. Related document(s) #6 . (L,MI)
July 6, 2020 Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by Personal Service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration c/o U.S. Attorney on 6/9/2020 filed on behalf of Richard Ridolfi. Related document(s) #6 . (L,MI)
June 5, 2020 Filing 6 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 6/5/2020 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (S,S)
June 5, 2020 Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 6/5/2020. (S,S)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 6/5/2020. (S,S)
May 21, 2020 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
May 21, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Richard Ridolfi. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia)
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Richard Ridolfi. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia)
May 21, 2020 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/21/2020. (L,MI)
May 21, 2020 Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (L,MI)
May 21, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ridolfi v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Ridolfi
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?