West v. Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc. et al
| Mario West |
| Loretta LaMalfa, Martin LaMalfa, Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc. and Michael LaMalfa |
| 1:2020cv01184 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Loretta LaMalfa, Martin LaMalfa, Michael LaMalfa, Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Loretta LaMalfa, #2 Summons Michael LaMalfa, #3 Summons Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc., #4 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Loretta LaMalfa, Martin LaMalfa, Michael LaMalfa, Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10008455. Filed by Mario West. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment, #3 Summons, Vine Beverage & Catering, Inc., #4 Summons, Michael LaMalfa, #5 Summons, Loretta LaMalfa, #6 Summons, Martin LaMalfa) (Bendau, Clifford) (B,R). |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
