PFG Ventures, LP v. Streich
| PFG Ventures, LP dba Proforma, Inc. and PFG Ventures, LP doing business as Proforma, Inc. |
| Steven Streich |
| 1:2020cv01274 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order of Dismissal. Plaintiff has a Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice. (ECF #8 ) The Defendant has filed a response stating that he consents to dismissal without prejudice. (ECF #9 ) Therefore, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 7/24/2020. re #8 , #9 , #11 . (M,S)
|
| Filing 11 Marginal Entry Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion to dismiss without prejudice (Related Doc #8 ) with consent of Defendant. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 7/24/2020. (M,S) |
| IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] Case Management Conference continued to 7/29/2020 at 09:15 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. (M,S) |
| Filing 10 Joint Case Management Report filed by Steven Streich. Related document #8 |
| Filing 9 Consent to #8 Motion to dismiss Without Prejudice filed by Steven Streich. (Lopez, Louis) |
| Filing 8 Motion to dismiss Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiff PFG Ventures, LP. (Schechter, Roy) |
| Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 7/27/2020 at 09:15 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 7/1/2020. (M,S) |
| Filing 6 Certified copy of state court documents received from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. (J,G) |
| Filing 5 Marginal Entry Order granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Louis D. Lopez for Steven Streich. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #4 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent on 6/12/2020. (M,S) |
| Filing 4 Motion for attorney Louis D. Lopez to Appear Pro Hac Vice. as Co-Counsel for Defendant Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10036681, filed by Defendant Steven Streich. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Louis D. Lopez, Esq.)(Jones, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Steven Streich. (Jones, Melissa) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, case number CV 20 932096 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10033838.. Filed by Steven Streich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jones, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
