Dayem v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Marwan Dayem |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv01790 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney on 8/17/2020; by FedEx on Office of Regional Counsel on 8/19/2020, Return marked C19, U.S. Attorney General on 8/19/2020 filed on behalf of Marwan Dayem Related document(s) #7 . (B,R)
|
|
Filing 7
Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/13/2020. (D,JJ)
|
|
Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Dayem's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/13/2020. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 4
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (B,R)
|
|
Filing 3
Status Report confirming compliance with Local Rule 9.1 filed by Marwan Dayem. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Marwan Dayem. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Marwan Dayem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 USM-285 Form, #8 USM-285 Form, #9 USM-285 Form) (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (B,R)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/12/2020. (B,R)
|
|
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case, (B,R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dayem v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marwan Dayem | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
