Noco Company v. Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Noco Company
Defendant: Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Topdon and USA Topdon LLC doing business as Topdon
Case Number: 1:2020cv01954
Filed: September 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James S Gwin
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/26/2020. The Court approves re #7 Stipulation filed by Noco Company with extension to answer complaint due 11/13/2020. (S,KM)
October 23, 2020 Filing 7 Proposed Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean)
October 1, 2020 Filing 6 Proposed Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Noco Company. Related document(s) #5 , #1 .(Malone, Sean)
September 17, 2020 Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon USA Topdon LLC on 9/11/2020 (signed c-19), filed on behalf of Noco Company. Related document(s) #3 . (L,Br)
September 16, 2020 Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean)
September 14, 2020 Notice of Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Local Rule 3.13(c) requires the filing of the #AO121 Copyright Report Form or #AO120 Patent and Trademark Report Form (W,Na)
September 1, 2020 Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd., USA Topdon LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,MI)
September 1, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean)
September 1, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10231449.. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Registration for Trademark, #2 Exhibit 2 - International Registration Summary, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Malone, Sean)
September 1, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (L,MI)
September 1, 2020 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noco Company v. Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noco Company
Represented By: Sean P. Malone
Represented By: David R. Posteraro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Topdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA Topdon LLC doing business as Topdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?