Stark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Tina Marie Stark
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv02009
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service by certified mail return receipt executed upon Office of Regional Counsel on September 14, 2020 filed on behalf of Tina Marie Stark Related document(s) #3 . (Shifrin, Debra)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service by Certified Mail Return Receipt executed upon US Attorney General on 09/14/2020 filed on behalf of Tina Marie Stark Related document(s) #3 . (Shifrin, Debra)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return of Service by Certified Mail Return Receipt executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o Dept. of Justice, Ofc US Atty on 9/11/2020 filed on behalf of Tina Marie Stark Related document(s) #3 . (Shifrin, Debra)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/14/2020. (G,CA)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (B,R)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney General) (B,R) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/8/2020: #3 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R).
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by Tina Marie Stark. Related document(s) #1 .(Shifrin, Debra)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10247147.. Filed by Tina Marie Stark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Shifrin, Debra)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case, (B,R)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (B,R)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/8/2020. (B,R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lynne H. Buck
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Marie Stark
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?