MRI Software LLC v. Varsity Properties, Inc
| MRI Software LLC |
| Varsity Properties, Inc. and Varsity Properties |
| 1:2020cv02067 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Scheduled teleconference held on November 4, 2020 with Plaintiff's representative Georgia Yanchar and her Counsel Clifton E. Preslan, Jr. and Defendant's representative A.J. Keilty and his Counsel Rachel L. Russo. Counsel reported the status of their settlement negotiations. Both parties agreed that they need a few more weeks of negotiations to try to settle the cases themselves. Accordingly, the Court scheduled a followup teleconference with counsel and clients beginning 4:00 p.m. on Monday, November 23, 2020. If this case is not settled by then, the parties shall file a proposed litigation schedule no later than 12 noon on November 23, 2020. Please use the same call-in instructions used for todays teleconference. Finally, the new deadline for filing a responsive pleading is December 4, 2020.Time: 15 min. (P,R) |
| Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Telephonic CMC held on October 14, 2020. Attending for Plaintiff was client representative Georgia Yanchar and Attorney Clinton E. Preslan, Jr.; attending for Defendant was client representative A. J. Kelly and Attorney Rachael L. Russo. As a result of discussions, the parties agreed to continue settlement discussions, and the Court scheduled a followup teleconference with counsel and clients beginning at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 4, 2020. Please use the call-in instructions used for today's teleconference. The deadline for filing a responsive pleading is November 12, 2020.Time: 15 min. (P,R) |
| Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. On September 21, 2020, the Court held a teleconference attended by Plaintiff's counsel Clinton Preslan; Plaintiff's representative Georgia Yanchar; Defendant's counsel Rachael Russo; and Defendant's representative AJ Keilty. The Court discussed Plaintiff's Complaint and encouraged settlement discussions. The Defendant's deadline to file its answer is extended, and Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than October 22, 2020. The Court scheduled a follow-up teleconference for October 14, 2020, at 2 pm. Time: 15 min. (P,R) |
| Notice [non-document] of Telephone Conference set for 9/21/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (K,K) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Varsity Properties(Russo, Rachael) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV 20 934173 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10265714. Filed by Varsity Properties (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket sheet & State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Russo, Rachael). |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
