Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Corneal A. Long
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv02110
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security on 9/23/2020; the U.S. Attorney General (signed c-19) and the Office of Regional Chief Counsel (signed c-19) on 9/25/2020 by FedEx, filed on behalf of Corneal A. Long. Related document(s) #6 .
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Certificate of Notice of Complete Social Security Number filed by Corneal A. Long. (Evans, Susan)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security, and Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/21/2020. (D,JJ)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/21/2020.(D,JJ)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Corneal A. Long. (Evans, Susan)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Corneal A. Long. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285) (Evans, Susan)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/18/2020. (L,MI)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corneal A. Long
Represented By: Susan M. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?