Municipal Services of America Corp v. City of Wickliffe, et al.
| municipal services of america corp and Municipal Services of America Corp. |
| Wickliffe Ohio, City of, ray sack, City of Wickliffe and Ray Sak |
| 1:2020cv02268 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon City of Wickliffe and Ray Sak. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. (Y,A) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (Y,A) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Monetary Damages in Excess of $75,000.00 and Injunctive Relief with jury demand against All Plaintiffs. Filing fee paid $400, receipt number BOHNDC-10325944. Filed by Municipal Services of America Corp. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Crook, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
