Dunlap v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Patrick Dunlap
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv02310
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Referring Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by Personal Service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration c/o U.S. Attorney on 10/30/2020; by FedEx on U.S. Attorney General on 11/2/2020 (marked C-19); by FedEx on Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 11/3/2020 filed on behalf of Patrick Dunlap Related document(s) #6 . (L,MI)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 10/29/2020 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (S,S)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 10/29/2020. (S,S)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 10/29/2020. (S,S)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Patrick Dunlap. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Patrick Dunlap. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/13/2020. (L,MI)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunlap v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Dunlap
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?