Miley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Pamela Jean Miley |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv02550 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 11/18/2020; the U.S. Attorney General (signed c-19) and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 11/20/2020 by FedEx, filed on behalf of Pamela Jean Miley. Related document(s) #7 . (L,Br)
|
|
Filing 7
Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 11/16/2020. (D,JJ)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 11/16/2020. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 4
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 3
Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by Pamela Jean Miley. Related document(s) #1 .(Shifrin, Debra)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case, (Y,A)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/13/2020. (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Pamela Jean Miley. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Pamela Jean Miley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Shifrin, Debra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamela Jean Miley | |
| Represented By: | Debra S. Shifrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
