Frye v. Sang et al
Barbara Frye |
Amanda Sang, Scott A. Burgess and Amanda Burgess |
1:2020cv02561 |
November 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 Acknowledgement of receipt of original state court record received on 12/28/2020 from Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Related document(s) #11 . (L,MI) |
Filing 11 Certified copy of State Court documents received from Medina County Court of Common Pleas. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Medina County Court) (L,MI) |
Filing 10 Minute Order of Teleconference and Order of Referral for Mediation. Case Management Conference held on 12/9/20. Case is assigned to the standard track. Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 1/4/2021, Discovery due by 5/21/2021, Dispositive Motions due by 6/21/2021, and a Telephone Conference is set for 4/30/2021 at 12:00 PM before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Counsel, clients and insurance representatives must attend. All shall use the same call-in instructions used for the Case management Conference. Case referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg for mediation. Time: 20 min. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/10/20. (P,R) Notice regenerated on 12/10/2020 (K,K). |
Filing 9 Initial Disclosures filed by All Defendants. (Smearman, R.) |
Filing 8 Initial Disclosures filed by All Plaintiffs. (Kovach, David) |
Filing 7 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - do not consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Kovach, David) |
![]() |
Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Scheduled teleconference held on Novembre 23, 2020. Attending were Plaintiff Barbara Frye and Attorney David J. Kovach; attending were Defendants Amanda Sang aka Amanda Burgess and Scott A. Burgess, insurance representatives Jamie Alpert and Dan Dillon, and Attorneys Jonathan H. Krol and Eric Smearman. The Court held the teleconference to ask questions in preparation for the Case Management Conference set for December 9, 2020. The Court encouraged the parties, insurance representatives and counsel to start discussing settlement, including a demand and counteroffer. Nothing further was scheduled. Time: 15 min. (P,R) |
Filing 5 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Scott A. Burgess, Amanda Sang. (Smearman, R.) |
Notice [non-document] of Telephone Conference set for 11/23/2020 at 11:30 AM before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (K,K) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance of Co-Counsel by Jonathan H. Krol filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Krol, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI) |
Filing 2 Notice of Removal of Civil Action, filed by Scott A. Burgess, Amanda Sang. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 -Return of Service for Amanda Sang, #4 Exhibit 3 -Return of Service for Scott A. Burgess)(Smearman, R.) |
Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet to Notice of Removal from Medina County Common Pleas Court, case number 20CIV0779 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10420246. Filed by Scott A. Burgess, Amanda Sang. (Smearman, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.