Bailey v. Warden, Cuyahoga County Jail
Petitioner: William D. Bailey
Respondent: Warden Michelle Henry and David Schilling, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2020cv02570
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2020 Filing 6 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by William D. Bailey. Related document(s) #1 . (L,Br)
December 7, 2020 Filing 5 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by William D. Bailey. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Inmate Health Care Grievance Form, #2 Letters)(L,Br)
November 24, 2020 Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by William D. Bailey. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 State Arrest Warrant)(L,Br)
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Ohio Southern. Case number 2:20-cv-05834. Electronic file, transfer order and docket sheet received.
November 16, 2020 Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to William D. Bailey #0159589 at Cuyahoga County Jail, P.O. Box 5600, Cleveland, OH 44101 on 11/16/2020. (W,CM)
November 16, 2020 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (W,CM)
November 16, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (W,CM)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, at Cleveland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/13/2020. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) [Transferred from ohsd on 11/16/2020.]
November 13, 2020 Case transferred to District of Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, at Cleveland. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (daf) [Transferred from ohsd on 11/16/2020.]
November 9, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 USC 2241 filed by William D. Bailey (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (kk2) [Transferred from ohsd on 11/16/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Warden, Cuyahoga County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Michelle Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Schilling, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William D. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?