King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sandra Therese King
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv02705
Filed: December 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Referring Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security on 12/15/2020; the U.S. Attorney General (signed c-19) and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel (signed c-19) on 12/17/20 by FedEx filed on behalf of Sandra Therese King. Related document(s) #7 . (L,Br)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 12/11/2020 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security. (S,S)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 12/11/2020. (S,S)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 12/11/2020. (S,S)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,MT)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of Service of Plaintiff's Social Security Number filed by Sandra Therese King. (Osterhout, Karl)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Sandra Therese King. Related document(s) #1 . (Osterhout, Karl)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Sandra Therese King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285) (Osterhout, Karl)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,MT)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2 Judge Sara Lioi on 12/04/2020. (M,MT)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,MT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Therese King
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Cara Staley Rafferty
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?