Antle Marketing, Inc. v. Continental Produce, LLC et al
| Antle Marketing, Inc. |
| Continental Produce, LLC, James Thomas Scarborough, Robin L. Scarborough and Crown Produce, LLC |
| 1:2020cv02747 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Continental Produce, LLC, Crown Produce, LLC, James Thomas Scarborough, Robin L. Scarborough. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Antle Marketing, Inc.. (Kyser, Eric) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Continental Produce, LLC, Crown Produce, LLC, James Thomas Scarborough, Robin L. Scarborough. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10487659. Filed by Antle Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Account and Unpaid Invoices, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - Continental Produce, LLC, #4 Summons - Crown Produce, LLC, #5 Summons - James Thomas Scarborough, #6 Summons - Robin L. Scarborough) (Kyser, Eric). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
