Scott v. Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Dallas L. Scott
Defendant: Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00639
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order: Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is Granted. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/20/21. (LC,S) re #9
May 20, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) Without Prejudice filed by Dallas L. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR 16.3(b)(3) - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Dallas L. Scott. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
April 19, 2021 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey C. Turner filed by on behalf of Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.. (Turner, Jeffrey)
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by David Benjamin Shaver filed by on behalf of Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.. (Shaver, David)
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.. (Turner, Jeffrey)
April 16, 2021 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Dallas L. Scott. Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C. waiver sent on 3/22/2021, answer due 5/21/2021 filed on behalf of Dallas L. Scott (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 5/21/2021 at 08:45 AM to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/06/21. (D,Ma)
March 22, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Action Revenue Recovery, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,MI)
March 22, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Action Revenue Recovery, LLC, Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10732292. Filed by Dallas L. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
March 22, 2021 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (L,MI)
March 22, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Action Revenue Recovery, L.L.C.
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Turner
Represented By: David Benjamin Shaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dallas L. Scott
Represented By: Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?