Chapa v. Sherwood Transportation, Inc.
Michael Chapa |
Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C. |
1:2021cv00745 |
April 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Donald C Nugent |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Sherwood's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket #8 ) is hereby DENIED. The Court has thoroughly reviewed Mr. Chapa's Complaint; Sherwood's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and, the Opposition and Reply Briefs submitted by the Parties. Accepting the factual allegations as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Mr. Chapa, the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint are sufficient to withstand judgment at this stage of the litigation. As discussed at the Case Management Conference held on May 21, 2021, discovery shall be complete by November 1, 2021. A Status Conference remains set for 8/23/2021 at 09:30 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent, at which time a briefing schedule for dispositive motions will be set. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 5/27/2021. (M,S) |
Filing 13 Minutes of proceedings before Judge Donald C. Nugent.Case Management Conference held on 5/21/21. Case is assigned to the standard track. Discovery due by 11/1/2021. Status Conference set for 8/23/2021 at 09:30 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. (Court Reporter: None.)Time: 15 minutes. (M,S) |
Filing 12 Reply in support of #8 Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C.. (Jones, Aaron) |
Filing 11 Opposition to #8 Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Michael Chapa. (Kovach, David) |
Filing 10 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Under Fed. R. CIV. P. 26(f) and LR 16.3(b) - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C.. (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 9 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's Motion to excuse Lead Counsel From Participating in Case Management Conference (Related Doc #7 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent on 5/4/2021. (M,S) |
Filing 8 Motion for judgment on the pleadings with memorandum in support filed by Defendant Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C. (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 7 Motion to excuse Lead Counsel From Participating in Case Management Conference filed by Defendant Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C.. Related document(s) #5 . (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 6 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C.. (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference on 5/21/2021 at 10:30 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 4/13/2021. (M,S) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment)(Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C. (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (M,MT) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-21-944853 Filing fee paid $402.00, receipt number AOHNDC-10764870. Filed by Sherwood Transportation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint and Exhibit B-Notice of Appearance) (Freeze, Bartholomew) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,MT) |
Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (M,MT) |
This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Related document(s) #1 . (M,MT) |
Notice by Clerk that Sherwood Transportation, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chapa v. Sherwood Transportation, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | Bartholomew T. Freeze |
Represented By: | Aaron M. Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Chapa | |
Represented By: | David J. Kovach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.