Optical Licensing LLC v. Rutronik Inc.
| Optical Licensing LLC |
| Rutronik Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00880 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document]: granting Defendant's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Robert M. Linn for Rutronik Inc.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (ECF No. #10 ). Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 6/7/2021. (Y,A)
|
| Filing 10 Motion for attorney Robert M. Linn to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10869572, filed by Defendant Rutronik Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Required by Gov. Bar R. XXII(2)(A)(6), #2 Exhibit Certificate of Pro Hac Vice Registration, #3 Proposed Order)(Tolhurst, Frederick) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Rutronik Inc.. (Tolhurst, Frederick) |
| Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 7/7/2021 at 2:00 PM in Chambers 16B before Judge J. Philip Calabrese. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 5/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26 Report of Parties) (Y,A) |
| Notice by Clerk that Rutronik, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (S,SR) |
|
Order [non-document]: Before the Court is Defendant Rutronik, Inc's unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. #7 .) The motion requests the Court extend Defendant's deadline through and including June 30, 2021. Counsel represents the motion is unopposed, and for good cause, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant is to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint no later than June 30, 2021. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 5/27/2021. (Y,A)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until June 30, 2021 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Rutronik Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tolhurst, Frederick) |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Frederick L. Tolhurst filed by on behalf of Rutronik Inc.. (Tolhurst, Frederick) |
| Filing 5 Certified mail receipt returned, addressed to Rutronik, Inc. c/o Michael A. Poklar, Registered Agent. Includes no signature or date. Related document(s) #4 . (L,Br) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Rutronik Inc, c/o Michael A. Poklar, Registered Agent. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7020 0090 0001 4429 0691. (L,Br) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Rutronik Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Optical Licensing LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Optical Licensing LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for infringement of patent with jury demand against Rutronik Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10803621. Filed by Optical Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US6791898, #2 Exhibit B-Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons) (Wernow, Howard) |
| This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (S,SR) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Optical Licensing LLC v. Rutronik Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rutronik Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Frederick L. Tolhurst |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Linn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Optical Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
