Cultrona v. Permanent General Assurance Corp.
Plaintiff: Nicole Cultrona
Defendant: Permanent General Assurrnace Corp. and Permanent General Assurance Corp.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01007
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James S Gwin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/14/2021 setting a case management conference on 7/27/2021 at 10:00 AM to be held by video conference (Cleveland) before Judge James S. Gwin. IMPORTANT: The Court requires the attendance of 1) all named parties, 2) lead counsel, and 3) a representative with full settlement authority (Attachments: #1 Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Local Rule 30.1)(S,KM)
June 10, 2021 Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Permanent General Assurance Corp. (Chyun, Edward)
May 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/20/2021 granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until 6/10/2021.(S,KM)
May 19, 2021 Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time until June 10, 2021 to Answer Complaint filed by Defendant Permanent General Assurance Corp. (Chyun, Edward)
May 14, 2021 Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI)
May 14, 2021 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (L,MI)
May 14, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI)
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent American Family Insurance for Permanent General Assurrnace Corp. filed by Permanent General Assurance Corp. (Chyun, Edward)
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga, case number CV-21-946113 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-10832357. Filed by Permanent General Assurance Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, Complaint and Case Information, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice Removal, #3 Declaration of Edward Chyun, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Chyun, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cultrona v. Permanent General Assurance Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Permanent General Assurrnace Corp.
Represented By: Edward H. Chyun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Permanent General Assurance Corp.
Represented By: Edward H. Chyun
Represented By: Elizabeth B. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Cultrona
Represented By: Mark R. Koberna
Represented By: Sean T. Koran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?