Smith v. Boiler Seafood SE, LLC
Plaintiff: Jamal Smith
Defendant: Boiler Seafood Se, LLC doing business as Boiler 65
Case Number: 1:2021cv01144
Filed: June 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] The Court grants (Doc. No. #4 ), Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and/or Respond to Plaintiff's Collective Action Complaint. Defendant Boiler Seafood SE, LLC is ordered to file its Answer and/or Response by 8/13/21 Judge Pamela A. Barker on 7/28/2021.(P,K)
July 27, 2021 Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 13, 2021 to answer and/or Respond to Plaintiff's Collective Action Complaint filed by Defendant Boiler Seafood Se, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Boseman, F.)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] The Court takes note that a certified mail receipt (Doc. No. #3 ) was returned on 7/2/2021 as part of a service packet upon Defendant, but that the receipt contains no signature or date. In order to ensure that service upon Defendant has indeed been perfected, Plaintiff is ordered to give a status report to the Court within 14 days of the date of this Order informing the Court of this service irregularity and any continued efforts to perfect service upon Defendant. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 7/26/2021. (P,K)
July 2, 2021 Filing 3 Certified mail receipt returned as part of a service packet upon The Boiler Seafood Se, LLC d/b/a The Boiler 65 but contains no signature or date. Related document(s) #2 . (L,Br)
June 15, 2021 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Boiler Seafood Se, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 2970 0000 7293 3627. (L,Br)
June 7, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Boiler Seafood Se, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI)
June 7, 2021 Filing 1 Collective Action Complaint with jury demand against Boiler Seafood SE, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402.00 Receipt number AOHNDC-10871276. Filed by Jamal Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Consent Form, #3 Summons) (Winters, Ryan)
June 7, 2021 Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI)
June 7, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Boiler Seafood SE, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boiler Seafood Se, LLC doing business as Boiler 65
Represented By: Ashley M. Fuchs
Represented By: Bradley A. Sherman
Represented By: F. Allen Boseman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamal Smith
Represented By: Kevin M. McDermott, II
Represented By: Ryan A. Winters
Represented By: Joseph F. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?