International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division |
CSX Transportation Corporation |
1:2021cv01240 |
June 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James S Gwin |
Labor: Railway Labor Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/20/2021 setting a case management conference on 10/7/2021 at 10:00 AM to be held by video conference (Cleveland) before Judge James S. Gwin. IMPORTANT: The Court requires the attendance of all named parties, lead counsel, and a representative with full settlement authority (Attachments: #1 1. Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 2. Local Rule 30.1)(S,KM) |
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/20/2021 granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Troy G. Mattila for CSX Transportation Corporation. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #4 )(S,KM) |
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/20/2021 granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Jacqueline M. Holmes for CSX Transportation Corporation. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #5 )(S,KM) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by CSX Transportation Corporation. (Henry, Shannon) |
Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by CSX Transportation Corporation. (Henry, Shannon) |
Filing 5 Motion for attorney Jacqueline M. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10989673, filed by Defendant CSX Transportation Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing from District of Columbia Court of Appeals, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing from the State of New York, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Jacqueline Holmes (document does not contain an original signature), #4 Proposed Order)(Henry, Shannon) Modified text on 8/20/2021 (M,TL). |
Filing 4 Motion for attorney Troy G. Mattila to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10989643, filed by Defendant CSX Transportation Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing from State of New York, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Troy Mattila (document does not contain an original signature), #3 Proposed Order)(Henry, Shannon) Modified text on 8/20/2021 (M,TL). |
Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Shannon L. Henry filed by on behalf of CSX Transportation Corporation. (Henry, Shannon) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon CSX Transportation Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,MT) |
Filing 1 Complaint against CSX Transportation Cprporation. Filing fee paid $402.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-10898166. Filed by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (McKinley, Shawn) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (M,MT) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division | |
Represented By: | Kevin C. Brodar |
Represented By: | Shawn M. McKinley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CSX Transportation Corporation | |
Represented By: | Jacqueline M. Holmes |
Represented By: | Troy G. Mattila |
Represented By: | Shannon L. Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.