Noco Company v. Mithlond LLC
| Noco Company |
| Mithlond LLC |
| 1:2021cv01457 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Default Entered on 9/13/2021 against Mithlond LLC. Sandy Opacich, Clerk by Sharon M. Romito, Deputy Clerk. Related document(s) #6 . (R,Sh) |
| Copy of #7 Default Entered mailed to Mithlond LLC 5241 E. Fellars Drive Scottsdale, AZ 85254 and Mitholnd LLC c/o Northwest Registered Agent, LLC, 1846 E. Innovaton Park Drive, Oro Valley, AZ 85755 on 9/13/2021. Related document(s) #7 . (R,Sh) |
| Filing 6 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Defendant Mithlond LLC filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit for Entry of Default)(Hartman, Derek) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Mithlond LLC on 8/2/2021, filed on behalf of Noco Company. Related document(s) #3 . (T,A) |
| Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
| Notice of Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Local Rule 3.13(c) requires the filing of the #AO121 Copyright Report Form or #AO120 Patent and Trademark Report Form by 8/6/2021. (W,Na) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to summons for service upon Mithlond LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,Ja) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Mithlond LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10955192.. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's sales on Walmart.com, #3 Exhibit C - Cease and Desist Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons) (Pinney, Jon) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Mithlond LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70210350000064411419. (L,Br) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (L,Ja) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,Ja) |
| This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (L,Ja) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Noco Company v. Mithlond LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Noco Company | |
| Represented By: | Alexander M. Welsh |
| Represented By: | Anna Elaine Bullock |
| Represented By: | Derek P. Hartman |
| Represented By: | Jon J. Pinney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mithlond LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
