Staggs v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Eric Staggs
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv01491
Filed: July 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2021 Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
August 23, 2021 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/23/2021. (D,JJ)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Eric Staggs's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/23/2021. (D,JJ)
August 20, 2021 Filing 5 Response to #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric Staggs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Acct information, #2 Exhibit B- Statement from Plaintiff)(Wilson, Rachel)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order: Plaintiff Staggs shall file a supplement to his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis no later than August 20, 2021. See Order for details. Related Doc. #2 . Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/10/2021. (D,JJ)
August 2, 2021 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,MT)
August 2, 2021 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,MT)
August 2, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,MT)
August 2, 2021 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (M,MT)
August 2, 2021 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Sara Lioi on 08/02/21. (M,MT)
July 31, 2021 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Eric Staggs. (Wilson, Rachel)
July 31, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Eric Staggs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Staggs v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Staggs
Represented By: Rachel C. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Rema Alberta Ina
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?