Herring v. Hill
Raymond Herring |
Warden Leon Hill |
1:2021cv01496 |
August 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James R Knepp |
David A Ruiz |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent to file an answer ("Return of Writ") to the petition within 60 days from the date of this order; Petitioner to file a reply by way of a Traverse within 30 days from the filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent shall have 15 days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 8/5/2021. (G,CA) |
Copy of #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to Warden Leon Hill, Marion Correctional Institution, PO Box 57, Marion, OH 43301-0057; and copy of #1 Petition and #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order emailed to the Office of the Attorney General on 8/5/2021. (G,CA) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 8/3/2021. (S,JM) |
Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,L) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid $ 5, receipt number AOHNDC-10962468.. Filed by Raymond Herring. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Brief in Support Additional Pages Question 12(A), #3 Brief in Support Brief in Support, #4 Appendix Exhibit List, #5 Exhibit Sentencing JE 293978, #6 Exhibit 1996 ORC 2929.41, #7 Exhibit ORC 2929.71 1993, #8 Exhibit ORC 2941.141, #9 Exhibit Sentencing JE CR 0003689, #10 Exhibit ORC 2929.41 2001, #11 Exhibit ORC 2929.14 2001, #12 Exhibit ORC 2941.145, #13 Exhibit ORC 2929.19 2001, #14 Exhibit ORC 2929.71 Repealed 1996, #15 Exhibit Sentencing JE CR 506705, #16 Exhibit ORC 2929.14 May 2008, #17 Exhibit ORC 2929.141 May 2008, #18 Exhibit ORC 2929.145 May 2008, #19 Exhibit Ohio Parole Board Decision 2010, #20 Exhibit Ohio Parole Board Decision 2012, #21 Exhibit Ohio Parole Board Decision 2015, #22 Exhibit 2015 Letter Sentence Computation, #23 Exhibit 2015 Quality Assurance Letter, #24 Exhibit Letter from Ohio Parole Board, #25 Exhibit 2018 Parole Board Decision, #26 Exhibit 2019 Letter from Sentence Computation) (Corrigan, Mary Catherine) |
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Herring v. Hill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Raymond Herring | |
Represented By: | Mary Catherine Corrigan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.