Alwan v. Rustic Gem, LLC et al
Leena Alwan |
Rustic Gem, LLC and Sean Moennich |
1:2021cv01508 |
August 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five, Six, and Seven of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #5 . (Hyman, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 Motion to dismiss count Five, Six, and Seven of Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Sean Moennich, Rustic Gem, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support). (Hyman, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand to Counts 1-4 filed by Rustic Gem, LLC. (Hyman, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Leena Alwan. All Defendants filed on behalf of Leena Alwan (Romer, Shawn) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided, and were not issued. (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10964710. Filed by Leena Alwan. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right To Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Romer, Shawn) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.