Brown v. Sivert, et al
| Charles Brown |
| SGT. Buddy Sivert, City of Lorain, Police Officer Steyven G. Curry, Police Chief Cel Rivera, Detective Augello and Police Department |
| 1:2021cv01630 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Charles Brown. (M,MT)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Charles Brown, unsigned. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Lorain Police Department Complaint Forms, #3 17CV193787 Motions, #4 Letter dated 08/27/16, #5 Letter dated 08/26/16, #6 Letter dated 08/25/16, #7 Letter dated 12/11/17, #8 17CV194012 Transcripts, #9 Letter dated 09/12/16, #10 Various Unmarked USM-285 & Certified Mail Receipts, #11 Letter dated 08/08/16, #12 6th Circuit Court of Appeals 06-3346, #13 Exhibit A - Letter with Case Law, #14 Exhibit B - 18CA011310 Appeal Judgment, #15 USM-285, #16 Envelope) (M,MT)
|
|
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (M,MT)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (M,MT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
