Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Jaco Manufacturing Company
| Ohio Security Insurance Company |
| Jaco Manufacturing Company and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive |
| 1:2021cv01779 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order to Show Cause. To date, the record indicates Plaintiff has failed to serve Defendant as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant or show good cause for failure to serve said Defendant as provided under the Rules, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice on December 15, 2021. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/5/21. (S,HR)
|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Jaco Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,TL) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Jaco Manufacturing Company. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11036545.. Filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Radakovich, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
