Johnson v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
| Mary Johnson |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland |
| 1:2021cv01806 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order of Dismissal. The Parties participated in a Mediation and were able to reach a settlement in this action. (See Minute Order, ECF #11 ). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Parties may file any additional documentation evidencing the settlement within 45 days of the entry of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/23/2022. (M,S)
|
|
Filing 11
Minute Order of Mediation Conference held on 2/15/2022. The parties reached a settlement and shall file a joint stipulated entry of dismissal with prejudice within seventy days. Mediation referral terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 2/15/2022. (Time: 6 hr.) (S,S)
|
|
Filing 10
Order referring case to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp for Mediation. Mediation set for 2/15/2022 at 10:00 AM to be held by ZOOM video conference (Akron) before Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. If mediation not successful, Status Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 08:45 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 2/9/2022. (M,S)
|
|
Filing 9
Order Setting Mediation to be held on 2/15/2022 at 10:00 AM by video conference (Cleveland) before Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. All parties and their lead counsel are ordered to participate. Confidential settlement statement due on 2/8/2022. Written itemization of damages and settlement demand due 2/1/2022. Written response and settlement offer due 2/7/2022. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/5/2022. Related document #8 . (G,CA)
|
|
Filing 8
Order referring case to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz for Mediation. The mediation process shall be scheduled by the Magistrate Judge and shall be completed on or before February 1, 2022. If mediation not successful, Status Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 08:45 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 11/23/2021. (M,S)
|
| Filing 7 Minutes of proceedings before Judge Donald C. Nugent.Case Management Conference held on 11/23/2021. Case is assigned to the standard track. Case referred for mediation to be completed by 2/1/2022. Discovery due by 4/8/2022. Next Status Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 08:45 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. (Court Reporter: None.) Time: 15 minutes. (M,S) |
| Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. (Dow, Dustin) |
| Filing 5 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Mary Johnson. (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference on 11/23/2021 at 09:45 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a conference call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 10/1/2021. (M,S) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Mary Johnson. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland waiver sent on 9/22/2021, answer due 11/22/2021 filed on behalf of Mary Johnson (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,MT) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Filing fee paid $402.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-11047430. Filed by Mary Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (M,MT) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Lalak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland | |
| Represented By: | Dustin M. Dow |
| Represented By: | John B. Lewis |
| Represented By: | Lauren T. Stuy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
