Martinez v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arturo Martinez
Defendant: McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01852
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Boyko
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2021 Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Moore, Bruce)
November 1, 2021 Filing 8 Notice of Case Management Conference with telephonic case management conference to be held on 12/29/21 at 11:30 AM before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. This Court requires the participation of lead counsel. The Court will host the conference call and inform counsel by way of separate email of the telephone number for the conference call. Parties shall be available by phone, if needed. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/1/21. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Report of Parties Planning Meeting, #2 Exhibit B- Consent Packet)(S,HR)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 18, 2021 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/1/21.(S,HR)
October 28, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Moore, Bruce)
October 28, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 18, 2021 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Bruce)
October 28, 2021 Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Bruce A. Moore filed by on behalf of McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. (Moore, Bruce)
October 28, 2021 Notice by Clerk that McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (L,Br)
October 12, 2021 Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by personal service executed upon McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. on 10/7/2021, filed on behalf of Arturo Martinez (Volheim, Nathan)
September 29, 2021 Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim filed by on behalf of Arturo Martinez. (Volheim, Nathan)
September 29, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Counsel for service upon McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,Ja)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11058491.. Filed by Arturo Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Volheim, Nathan)
September 29, 2021 Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (L,Ja)
September 29, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arturo Martinez
Represented By: Nathan C. Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.
Represented By: Bruce A. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?