Kosdrosky v. Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.
Plaintiff: Zaine Kosdrosky
Defendant: Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02043
Filed: October 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (O,K)
December 3, 2021 Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order: Telephone case management conference (CMC), with counsel only, to be held on 1/21/2022 at 1:00 p.m. before Judge Sara Lioi. Directions for joining the call will be emailed to counsel of record no later than the day before the CMC. The disclosures mandated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) will all apply. Plaintiff must serve on opposing parties the initial disclosures by 12/31/2021. All other parties must serve on opposing parties the initial disclosures by 1/7/2022. Attorneys are cautioned not to rely on the docket entry only. Read the attached Order for additional information and requirements. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (O,K)
December 3, 2021 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.. (Keeton, Anne)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.. (Keeton, Anne)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.; return to sender, forward time expired. Service attempted by certified mail on 11/12/2021 filed on behalf of Zaine Kosdrosky. (M,CE)
November 12, 2021 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1120 0001 5155 8464. (W,CM)
October 28, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI)
October 28, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11106343.. Filed by Zaine Kosdrosky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Robb, Samuel)
October 28, 2021 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (L,MI)
October 28, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kosdrosky v. Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zaine Kosdrosky
Represented By: Samuel B. Robb
Represented By: Daniel S. Dubow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Wireless Brecksville, Inc.
Represented By: Anne P. Keeton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?