JMELT LLC et al v. Swaffer
| JMELT LLC, Hughes Contracting Services, LLC, Doug Roser, Sam Mazzola and Daniel Hollis |
| Kris Swaffer |
| 1:2021cv02095 |
| November 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Kris Swaffer. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by JMELT LLC. (Teare, Travis)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Hughes Contracting Services. (Teare, Travis)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Kris Swaffer. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11120610. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:20CV1848. Filed by Sam Mazzola, JMELT LLC, Doug Roser, Hughes Contracting Services, Daniel Hollis. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Haren, Thomas)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
