Grantonz, et al v. Earley, et al
Plaintiff: Ebony Grantonz and Sylvester White
Defendant: Michelle D. Earley, Russell R. Brown III, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera, John Doe and John Does
Case Number: 1:2021cv02137
Filed: November 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Boyko
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order. The Court adopts the parties' joint proposed schedule. Defendants' Answer shall be filed by January 10, 2022. Initial disclosures shall be due December 29, 2021 and discovery requests shall be propounded no later than December 30, 2021 with fourteen days to respond. Depositions shall be concluded January 21, 2022 and the parties shall have five days thereafter to review and sign off on the deposition transcripts. The Preliminary Injunction hearing will be held on February 10, 2022 at 2:00 pm EST. Hearing will take place at the Howard M. Metzenbaum US Courthouse, East Chambers - Room 328, 201 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114. The parties shall submit cross briefs no later than January 27, 2022 for the Preliminary Injunction hearing. The parties shall also file with the Court a list of witnesses they intend to call at the Preliminary Injunction hearing, the subject matter on which they will testify and the estimated length of time for the presentation of their respective cases. The Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in effect until the Preliminary Injunction hearing. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/20/21. (S,HR)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Parties' Joint Proposal filed by Russell R. Brown III, Michelle D. Earley, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera. (Fischbach, Tiffany)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Opinion and Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Related Doc #2 ). Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the COVID-19 vaccine requirement in AO 2021-05 against Plaintiffs Grantonz and White. Defendants may not terminate Plaintiffs' employment for the reason that Plaintiffs have not received a COVID-19 vaccine. The Temporary Restraining Order is effective as of the date of the entry of this Order and will expire in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. The Court dispenses with the requirement of posting appropriate bond or security. On or before December 17, 2021, the parties shall submit a joint proposal for the schedule of this case going forward. The parties shall inform the Court whether expedited discovery is necessary and shall propose agreed available dates for a preliminary injunction hearing. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/10/21.(S,HR)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Russell R. Brown III waiver sent on 11/10/2021, answer due 1/10/2022 filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Abens, Matthew)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Sylvester White, Ebony Grantonz. Michelle D. Earley waiver sent on 11/10/2021, answer due 1/10/2022; Tanya Jones waiver sent on 11/10/2021, answer due 1/10/2022; Marinelli Rivera waiver sent on 11/10/2021, answer due 1/10/2022 filed on behalf of Sylvester White; Ebony Grantonz (Abens, Matthew)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Reply to response to #2 Emergency Motion for temporary restraining order filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Copy of BST Holdings v. OSHA 5th Circuit opinion, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Marilyn Cassidy, #3 Supplement Copy of Ohio Attorney General Opinion 2003-020, #4 Exhibit 1 - Email regarding Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts vaccination policy, #5 Exhibit 2- Email regarding Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department's vaccination policy, #6 Exhibit 3 - Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court vaccination order)(Abens, Matthew)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Supplement to the Memorandum in #9 Opposition to #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Russell R. Brown III, Michelle D. Earley, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera. Related document(s) #9 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unsworn Declaration of Russell Brown)(Webber, Mark)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Opposition to #2 Emergency Motion for temporary restraining order filed by Russell R. Brown III, Michelle D. Earley, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unsworn Declaration of Russell Brown, #2 Exhibit St. John AME Communication, #3 Exhibit Unsworn Declaration of Michael Negray, #4 Exhibit LA County Department of Health COVID-19 Vaccine and Fetal Cell Lines, #5 Exhibit Unsworn Declaration of Michelle Earley)(Webber, Mark)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order: For the reasons set forth in this order, The Court adopts the parties' agreed briefing schedule: Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF DKT #2 ) shall be filed by November 19, 2021. Plaintiffs' Reply Brief shall be filed by November 24, 2021. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/12/2021. (L,Ja)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Minutes of proceedings[non-document] before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. Telephone Conference held on 11/12/2021. Order to follow. Time: 10 minutes. (L,Ja)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Tiffany C. Fischbach filed by on behalf of Russell R. Brown III, Michelle D. Earley, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera. (Fischbach, Tiffany)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Mark V. Webber filed by on behalf of Russell R. Brown III, Michelle D. Earley, Tanya Jones, Marinelli Rivera. (Webber, Mark)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Plaintiffs' Notice of Compliance with the Court's Order of November 10, 2021 (Doc. #4) filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #4 .(Abens, Matthew)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order re #2 Emergency Motion for temporary restraining order. Upon review of Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, the Court sets an Attorney Telephone Conference for Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The Court will provide conference call information that morning. Furthermore, Plaintiffs' counsel shall contact the City of Cleveland Law Department in order to identify Defendants' representation and shall provide opposing counsel with notice of this Order. Prior to the conference, if the parties stipulate to an expedited briefing schedule, to an extension of the employment termination date commensurate with the briefing dates, and file that stipulation with the Court, there will be no need to go forward with the scheduled conference. Based on the City's denial letters, the Court finds that there is no immediate harm warranting granting ex parte relief. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/10/21. (S,HR)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and were not issued. (L,MI)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Emergency Motion for temporary restraining order filed by Ebony Grantonz, Sylvester White. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, #2 Exhibit A - Administrative Order 2021-05, #3 Exhibit B - Blank exemption request form, #4 Exhibit C - Grantonz exemption request, #5 Exhibit D - White exemption request, #6 Exhibit E - Defendant Brown 10.28.21 letter to Grantonz, #7 Exhibit F - Defendant Brown 10.28.21 letter to White, #8 Exhibit G - Verified Complaint)(Abens, Matthew)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Verified Complaint for temporary restraining order, preliminary & permanent injunctive relief, and declaratory relief against all Defendants. Filing fee paid $402.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-11126830. Filed by Ebony Grantonz. (Attachments: #1 Verification of Plaintiff Ebony Grantonz, #2 Verification of Plaintiff Sylvester White, #3 Exhibit 1 - Administrative Order 2021-05, #4 Exhibit 2 - Defendant Brown 10.28.21 letter to Grantonz, #5 Exhibit 3 - Defendant Brown 10.28.21 letter to White, #6 Exhibit 4 - City of Cleveland Vaccine Confirmation Status form, #7 Exhibit 5 - Blank Employee Exemption Request Form, #8 Exhibit 6 - Grantzonz exemption request, #9 Exhibit 7 - White exemption request, #10 Civil Cover Sheet). (Abens, Matthew)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grantonz, et al v. Earley, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebony Grantonz
Represented By: Brian M. Yusko
Represented By: David L. Harvey, III
Represented By: Matthew B. Abens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvester White
Represented By: Brian M. Yusko
Represented By: David L. Harvey, III
Represented By: Matthew B. Abens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle D. Earley
Represented By: Mark V. Webber
Represented By: Tiffany C. Fischbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell R. Brown III
Represented By: Mark V. Webber
Represented By: Tiffany C. Fischbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tanya Jones
Represented By: Mark V. Webber
Represented By: Tiffany C. Fischbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marinelli Rivera
Represented By: Mark V. Webber
Represented By: Tiffany C. Fischbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?