Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Eric Lewis |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
1:2021cv02221 |
November 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Darrell A Clay |
James S Gwin |
Social Security: HIA |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 2/21/2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis). (Johnson, Lisa) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 2/21/2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security Administration answer due 2/21/2022. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 1/19/2022.(R,Ke) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Ke) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 11/22/2021. (R,Ke) |
Filing 4 Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 11/22/2021.(R,Ke) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/22/2021. (L,Ja) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Eric Lewis. (Wilson, Rachel) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Eric Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (L,Ja) |
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,Ja) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James S. Gwin on 11/22/2021. (L,Ja) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (L,Ja) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric Lewis | |
Represented By: | Rachel C. Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.